Legal Opinion

In re Roger S.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 26, 1995No. 139PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

We are asked in this case to determine whether the District Court of Maryland in Montgomery County, sitting as the juvenile court,1 had the authority to commit a child to the Montgomery County Board of Education and order the public schools to provide post-secondary transitional services to the child until twenty-one years of age. We shall hold that this order exceeded the court’s authority under the Juvenile Causes Act, Maryland Code (1974, 1989 Repl.Vol., 1993 Cum.Supp.) §§ 3-801 to 3-837 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (“CJ”).

I

Appellee Roger S. suffers from a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Tidewater/Havre De Grace, Inc. v. Mayor of Havre De GraceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Motor Vehicle Administration v. GaddyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Office of People's Counsel v. Maryland Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Williams v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. In re Ryan W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API