Legal Opinion

State v. Dahlheimer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 6, 1987No. CX-87-1034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MULALLY, Judge.

Respondent Kirk Dahlheimer was charged with three gross misdemeanors: driving while under the influence of alcohol within five years of a prior conviction; driving while under the influence within ten years of two prior convictions; and driving after revocation, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(a) and subd. 3(a) and (b) (1986) and Minn.Stat. § 169.129 (1986). At the omnibus hearing, the court found the stop and subsequent arrest of respondent were invalid and the products of the arrest were not admissible. On ap peal, the state claims the stop and arrest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Windschitl v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Shull v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Schmidtbauer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Bost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API