Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Los Angeles County Bureau of Adoptions

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1967No. Civ. 30852PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal “from the decree denying adoption entered July 5, 1966, and from the denial of both Motion for New Trial, and, (in the Alternative), Motion to Vacate a Decree and to Enter Another and Different Decree denied in Court July 19, 1966.” The appeal, in effect, is from the denial of the petition of Madeline Marie Christensen and Wayne Ilarbro Christensen for the adoption of Baby Boy Richardson, and removal of the subject minor from the homes of potitioners-appellants and commitment of the child to the Los Angeles County Bureau of Adoption, pursuant to section 226c of the Civil…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of CarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. Richard W.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Cedar Rapids Steel Transportation, Inc. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Pac. & Sw. Annual Conference of United Methodist Church v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. StockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API