Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Stowell

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1935No. Civ. No. 5252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODWARD, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendants, N. W. Stowell and Mary J. Stowell, husband and wife, from a judgment and decree of foreclosure wherein the indebtedness of said defendants to plaintiff was determined by the trial court to be the sum of $514,787.15, and costs. The real property affected by the decree may be generally referred to as the Stowell Hotel, situated on Spring Street, between Fourth and Fifth Streets, in the city of Los Angeles.

*375Before stating the comparatively simple legal questions involved, we will briefly examine the factual background of the controversy.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Scragg v. SalleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Berry v. Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Roth v. ThomsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Watt v. CopelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bisno v. HerzbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Travelers Ins. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. Engleman v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API