Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sontheimer v. Pierce

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1948No. L. A. 20156Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

i I am convinced that the oraer of the trial court holding that the testator intended the adopted children of the annuitants to be included in the term “children, lawful issue” should be affirmed. . . "

The general rule is that the findings of a trial court should be liberally construed and any inconsistency therein so resolved as to uphold rather than defeat its judgment. (Woodbine v. Van Horn, 29 Cal.2d 95, 109 [173 P.2d 17]; Menghetti v. Dillon, 10 Cal.2d 470, 472 [75 P.2d 596]; Ensele v. Jolley, 188 Cal. 297, 303 [204 P. 1085]; Murray v. Tulare Irrigation Co., 120 Cal. 311, 315…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Estate of NorthcuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Campbell v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Ensele v. JolleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API