Graham v. Work
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Van Burén District Court. — Hon. Francis M. Hunter, Judge. Action at law ou account for merchandise. Trial to jury. Verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWithrow, J.
Appellees are engaged in the business of general merchandising at Birmingham, Iowa. Hannah Work, widow of Samuel Work, lived at Birmingham, and at the time of the commencement of this action was about eighty-eight years of age. After suit was brought, her son, James Work, was appointed as her guardian. Later, after the trial of the cause in the/lower court, Mrs. Work died, and R. E. Work, her son, was appointed administrator of her estate, and has been substituted as defendant. During the lifetime of Mr. Work he, with his wife, maintained their home at Birming*385ham, the members of the household…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Schoonover v. Osborne Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Veiths v. HaggeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Gibson v. SeneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Visher v. WilburCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dalbey Bros. Lumber Co. v. CrispinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. DenboerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2010
- H. W. Emeny Auto Co. v. NeiderhauserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Hansen v. KaperonisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- United States v. Cedar Valley Livestock Exchange, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.