H. W. Emeny Auto Co. v. Neiderhauser
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marshall District Court. — B. F. Cummings, Judge. Action upon account for goods sold and delivered and for repairs to two certain automobiles. The defendant admitted during the trial all but five items of the account, and these he denied. Upon issues joined as to these items, the case was submitted to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
•Deemer, J.
*221•l. evidence :. ' books of origifedger^ages • S°¿ímen’s *220I. The items of account in dispute are a secondhand- Buick automobile, an outer casing, an inner *221tube and the repairing of a Cadillac and a Buick car. The purchase of the Buick car is admitted, but it is claimed that in consideration thereof plaintiff was to keep it in repair without expense.. The repair work on the Cadillac.' car. is admitted, at least to a certain extent, but .the charges are said to be exorbitant; the furnishing of the casing and tube are admitted, but it is claimed that one was furnished for a car loaned…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gibson v. SeneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Graham v. WorkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dalbey Bros. Lumber Co. v. CrispinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Hansen v. KaperonisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- United States v. Cedar Valley Livestock Exchange, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
- Shea v. Biddle Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- State v. BrassfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.