Legal Opinion

Callicotte v. Carlucci

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 23, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-1435PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(Granting Preliminary Injunction)

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Senior District Judge:

On June 20, 1988, an order granting preliminary injunction was entered in this proceeding with an explanation that a detailed opinion would follow. This Memorandum Opinion provides the reasons for the entry of that Order.

Plaintiff Betty M. Callicotte, an employee at the Defense Mapping Agency, Department of Defense (“DMA” or “Mapping Agency”), brings this discrimination action alleging that the DMA failed to accommodate her dual handicap of chronic alcoholism and acute chronic mental depression.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Caspar W. Weinberger, National Council of State Agencies for the Blind v. Caspar W. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cosmair, Inc., L'OreaL Hair Care DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rann v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  2. Cain v. HyattDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Stores v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  4. Janssen v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
  5. Pollis v. New School for Social ResearchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API