Legal Opinion
Cain v. Hyatt
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 3, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-6665PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
In this nonjury case, plaintiff Clarence Cain alleges that the defendants’ decision to remove him as regional partner of Hyatt Legal Services because he had contracted acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) violated the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, Act of October 27, 1955, Pub.L. No. 744 (codified as amended at 43 Pa.Stat.Ann. § 951 et seq.), which proscribes employment discrimination on the basis of non-job related handicap or disability. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Wolk v. Saks Fifth Avenue Inc., 728…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Harris v. ThigpenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Griffiths v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Labonte v. Hutchins & WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Doe v. Kohn Nast & Graf, P.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.