Legal Opinion

Application of Meakin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 3, 1953No. Patent Appeal 5977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Judge.

Appellant, having been allowed 11 claims for a pellet mill described in the specification of his application for a patent, appeals here from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting, as unpatentable over the disclosures of the prior art of record, claims 2, 3, 12, 15, 16, 17, and 19 of the same application.

The references relied upon are: Wallace 299, 883 June 3, 1884; Meakin 2,065,141 Dec. 22, 1936; Meakin 2,075,450 Mar. 30, 1937; Gits 2,077,880 Apr. 20, 1937.

Appealed claims 2, 12, and 15…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of DaltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. In Re FerenciCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  3. In re CoulterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of Leo L. HengeholdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API