People v. Alexander
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Contending that the evidence against him is inherently improbable and that the court “applied an improper rule of law,” defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of robbery of the first degree, i. e., one committed while the robber is armed with a deadly weapon. (Pen. Code, § 211a.)
On Friday, March 29, 1946, at 11 a. m. three Negro men entered the jewelry store of Peter Borisoif in the city of Los Angeles. By holding a gun' they forced the proprietor into a back room, took off his clothes, removed certain merchandise including a diamond wrist watch worth $575 from the store and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. DowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lawrence v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. WhitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. CostelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Buckley v. CoreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- State v. PedersonArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. MulqueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. AshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.