Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Fisher

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1943No. 28658PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

— This action was instituted to quiet title in plaintiffs, owners of lots 3 and 4 in block 12 of Law’s addition to Tacoma, to a strip of land, to restrain defendants from trespassing upon that strip, and to recover for past trespasses upon that land by defendants. Trial of the cause to the court resulted in entry of decree and judgment in harmony with findings in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants appealed.

The facts are as follows: In 1869, James W. Law obtained a patent to the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section 25, township 21 north, range 2 east W. M. January 3, 1870, Law…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frye v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. City of Chicago v. BordenIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. City of Seattle v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Matthews v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Mueller v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Cummins v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Pullin v. VictorIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Lopeman v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Nelson v. Pacific CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API