Pullin v. Victor
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a tort action for damages arising from alleged fraud and misrepresentation of boundary location and acreage in a sale of real property. We vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
The following facts were presented to the district court. In 1961, Wiley and Shirley Pullin, buyers of the real property in question, were contacted by an agent for the sellers, Nolan and Ruby Victor. The buyers wanted a house and an acre of land on which to pasture calves or other animals and to have a garden. The sellers’ agent showed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Huyck v. Hecla Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Meier v. Portland Cable Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Doyle v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Village of Lee v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- West Wood Investments, Inc. v. AcordIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Farrell v. Board of Com'rs, Lemhi CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Worley Highway District v. Yacht Club of Coeur D'Alene, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Stafford v. KlostermanIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.