Legal Opinion

Lopeman v. Hansen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1949No. 30889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin defendants from using a strip of plaintiff’s land. Defendants cross-complained to enjoin plaintiffs from obstructing it on the ground that it is a public road. Defendants appeal from a decree in plaintiffs’ favor.

All the land described is in township twenty-two north, range twenty-eight east, Willamette meridian. Respondents own all of section twenty-five, which lies immediately east of section twenty-six. Appellants own the south half of section twenty-six and respondents own the northeast quarter of it.

The disputed area is a sixty-foot strip a mile…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Roediger v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. Shorett v. Blue Ridge Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Roundtree v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Stevens County v. BurrusWashington Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gray v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Turner v. DavissonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Karb v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Millard v. GrangerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Friends of North Spokane County Parks v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API