Lopeman v. Hansen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin defendants from using a strip of plaintiff’s land. Defendants cross-complained to enjoin plaintiffs from obstructing it on the ground that it is a public road. Defendants appeal from a decree in plaintiffs’ favor.
All the land described is in township twenty-two north, range twenty-eight east, Willamette meridian. Respondents own all of section twenty-five, which lies immediately east of section twenty-six. Appellants own the south half of section twenty-six and respondents own the northeast quarter of it.
The disputed area is a sixty-foot strip a mile…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Roediger v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Shorett v. Blue Ridge Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
- Roundtree v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Stevens County v. BurrusWashington Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gray v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Turner v. DavissonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Karb v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Millard v. GrangerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Friends of North Spokane County Parks v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.