Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Equinox Holdings, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 3, 1989No. 20620-6-I; 20913-2-IPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, C.J.

Cassimear Joseph Clarke and Elizabeth Clarke (Clarke) appeal three orders dismissing their action against Equinox Holdings, Ltd. (Equinox), challenging the constitutionality of the Real Estate Contract Forfeiture Act, the forfeiture of their real estate contract with Equinox, and the failure of Equinox to execute a final option agreement. Clarke also appeals the order granting Equinox attorney's fees and expenses. We affirm.

Facts

On August 10, 1985, Clarke entered into a real estate contract with Equinox for the purchase of real estate located in Snohomish County. In the spring of 1986, Clarke…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Del Guzzi Constr. Co. v. Global Northwest Ltd., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hontz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Shelton Hotel Co., Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Fluke Capital & Management Services Co. v. RichmondWashington Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  2. Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Biggs v. VailWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Rhinehart v. Seattle Times, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API