Legal Opinion

Biggs v. Vail

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1992No. 57451-1PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.

Facts of Case

The primary issue in this case is whether attorneys' fees may be awarded pursuant to the frivolous lawsuit statute (RCW 4.84.185) when some, but not all, of the claims for relief 1 in a pleading are frivolous. We construe the statute to require a finding that the action, in its entirety, is frivolous, before fees may be awarded under the statute.

Petitioner Patrick Biggs and respondent David B. Vail, both attorneys, entered into an employment arrangement in January 1985 under which Biggs became an employee in Vail's law firm. The employment arrangement did not work out and Biggs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. World Wide Video, Inc. v. City of TukwilaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Brown v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Burton v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API