Boeing Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action under the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”).2 The Government has moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that there is a failure of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On February 26, 1985, the Electronic Systems Division of the United States Air Force awarded contract number F4168985-C-0528 to plaintiff. This is one of three contracts awarded to Boeing in connection with the Peace Shield Program to provide an air defense system to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Contract number F4168985-C-0528…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Pathman Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Claude E. Atkins Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- Orbas & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992