Legal Opinion
Boeing Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 28, 1992No. 92-69CPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (“CDA”).1 Plaintiff asserts that it submitted two claims pursuant to the Act, and that those claims are properly before the court. The government has moved to dismiss on the ground that there is a failure of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND2
The Air Force awarded Boeing three of five contracts generated in connection with the Peace Shield Program, an air defense, command, communication, and control system for the Kingdom of Saudi…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Overall Roofing & Construction Inc., A/K/A Overall Roofing, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992