Legal Opinion

Claude E. Atkins Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 23, 1992No. 92-377 CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TURNER, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1988) (“CDA”). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss three of the four counts (Counts I, II and IV) in plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction because there was neither an actual nor a deemed final decision by the contracting officer when the complaint was filed. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion to dismiss counts I, II and IV should be denied.

I

On March 31, 1989, plaintiff entered a contract with defendant to build enlisted personnel housing at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Orbas & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  2. Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Bauer v. DevosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  4. Nexagen Networks, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. California Department of Water Resources v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API