Legal Opinion

Silk Co. v. . Spinning Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs allege that they contracted to sell to the defendant, Kinston Spinning Company, what is known as a (423) "Throwing Machinery Plant," which is used in the manufacture of certain kinds of silk products, upon the understanding and agreement that the Spinning Company should increase its capital stock from the amount ($50,000) it was then represented to be, to $80,000, and that said capital stock, when so increased, should be divided into preferred stock to the amount of $30,000 and common stock to the amount of $50,000, the plaintiff, G. W. Graham Company, to receive, as its part of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Knight v. . HoughtallingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Voorhees v. Porter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Dawson Bank v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Goodwin v. ClaytorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Marstaller v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maitia v. Allied L. & L. S. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cross v. Capital Transaction Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Atwater v. BaskervilleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  4. Caldlaw, Inc. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Savannah Sugar Refining Co. v. Royal Crown Bottling Co. of Wilmington, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API