Legal Opinion

Savannah Sugar Refining Co. v. Royal Crown Bottling Co. of Wilmington, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1963No. 162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The primary relief which plaintiffs seek is an adjudication that the property conveyed by Bottling Company is chargeable with the payment of the debts owing plaintiffs because conveyed in fraud of their rights. Does this common interest give plaintiffs the right to bring this action? The answer is yes.

In Wall v. Fairley, 73 N.C. 464, a judgment creditor and an unsecured creditor sought to have a conveyance made at the instance of defendant Fairley to his codefendant declared void because fraudulent as to them. There as here defendants demurred for misjoinder. The Court, in rejecting that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Edmeston v. LydeNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  2. Dawson Bank v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Monroe Bros. & Co. v. LewaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Robinson v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Mebane v. . LaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graves v. WelbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Lund Ex Rel. Wilbur v. PrattSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. Underwood v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Underwood v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API