Legal Opinion
Kansas City Urology, P.A. v. United Healthcare Services
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 15, 2008No. WD 67814, WD 67815PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City and United Healthcare Services sepa rately appeal the circuit court’s order to deny their motions to compel arbitration of the antitrust claims pending in a single case in circuit court and numbered 0516-CV04219. In this interlocutory appeal, Blue Cross and United Healthcare seek this court’s immediate review pursuant to Section 435.440.1(1), RSMo 2000, and 9 U.S.C. Section 16(a)(1)(B) (1999). Because their appeals present identical issues, we consolidated them.
Kansas City area physicians and medical organizations entered into…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Collins & Aikman Products Co. v. Building Systems, Inc. And U.S. Commercial Floor SystemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Fallo v. High-Tech InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet CadillacMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Whitworth v. McBRIDE & SON HOMES, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Pleasants v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Woods v. QC Financial Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.