Legal Opinion

Swofford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 2010No. ED 93661PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Judge.

Movant, Randall Craig Swofford, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We vacate the judgment and remand the cause with directions to dismiss the motion because movant failed to timely file his pro se motion as required by Rule 29.15(b).

A jury found movant guilty of four counts of criminal nonsupport, in violation of section 568.040 RSMo (2000), arising out of his failure to provide support to his two minor children. The trial court sentenced movant to four days in jail on one…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. J.C.W. Ex Rel. Webb v. WyciskallaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. Gehrke v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Malone v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Gerlt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. CORNELIOUS v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Mitchell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Pettry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API