Legal Opinion
Nankivel v. . Omsk All Russian Government
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 4, 1923PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.
The primary question is as to the validity of a judgment for $96,392.38 entered by default in Supreme Court, New York county, on May 9, 1922, against Omsk All Russian Government in an action brought to recover-the value of certain automobiles requisitioned and seized by it within its territory during the months of December, 1918, and January, February and March, 1919. The summons and complaint were delivered on April 12, 1922, in New York, to Serge Ughet, said to be the managing agent of defendant.
Appellants resist an order for their examination in supplementary proceedings in aid of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Porto Rico v. Rosaly Y CastilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- O'Donoghue v. . BoiesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Pendleton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Williams v. BruffySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Wulfsohn v. Russian Socialist Federated Soviet RepublicNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Fred S. James & Co. v. Second Russian InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Puente v. Spanish Nat. StateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- In re Investigation of World Arrangements with Relation to the Production, Transportation, Refining & Distribution of PetroleumDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.