Legal Opinion

Bollong v. Corman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1921No. 16307PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered November 20, 1920, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action for equitable relief, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Respondents have moved to strike appellants ’ brief and dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the same is not sufficiently definite as to its contents to comply with the rules of court. The motion has been considered and the brief of appellants examined with reference thereto, and we are of the opinion that the motion should be, and it is, denied.

*337This case is a sequel of Buchanan v. Schubach, 106 Wash. 399, 180 Pac. 407, where some of the history of the controversy still existing between the present parties may be found. That was a suit on a note and to foreclose a real estate mortgage,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Winston v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ordway v. DowneyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Buchanan v. SchubachWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Snyder v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hardinger v. FullertonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Damascus Milk Co. v. MorrissCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  4. Bollong v. CormanWashington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API