Legal Opinion
Bollong v. Corman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1923No. 17755PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Various matters involved in the transactions between some of these parties have been before us in Buchanan v. Schubach, 106 Wash. 399, 180 Pac. 407, and Bollong v. Corman, 117 Wash. 336, 201 Pac. 297.
When the case last cited was remanded for retrial by the superior court and tried, it was found as a fact that the defendant Corman had orally personally assumed and agreed to pay the mortgage of the Bollongs to Buchanan, as executor of the last will and testament of William H. Gamidge, deceased. The trial court, howe\; er, refused to relieve against the respondents by way cf subrogating…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Murray v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- DeRoberts v. StilesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Buchanan v. SchubachWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Bollong v. CormanWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Moody v. IsselsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Casualty Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Ford v. Nokomis State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Damascus Milk Co. v. MorrissCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Christopher And Suzanne Guest, V David And Karen LangeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Johnson v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1929