Legal Opinion

Hardinger v. Fullerton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1931No. 23352. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This action was brought in the court below by appellant Hardinger against defendants Fullerton and wife and' Sutherland and wife to recover from them installments due on a real estate purchase contract. For brevity, the parties will henceforth be designated as plaintiff, defendants Fullerton, and respondents. Defendants Fullerton, who had transferred the contract to respondents, cross-complained against respondents on the theory that they had assumed the payments due thereunder.

Upon a trial to the court, it found on the facts that respondents had not assumed the payments, and entered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Winston v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ordway v. DowneyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Chaffee v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bimrose v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Stewart v. BaldwinWashington Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Murr v. Selag Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Townsend v. RosenbaumWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Higgenbotham v. TopelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Lydig Construction, Inc. v. Rainier National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Lewis v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API