Legal Opinion

United States v. Burnette

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 21, 2008No. Criminal 05-0095(PLF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant Mark Burnette’s motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The government opposes Mr. Burnette’s motion. 1 For the reasons stated below, the Court agrees with the government that it would be inappropriate to exercise its discretion to reduce Mr. Burnette’s sentence.

On February 3, 2006, Mr. Burnette pled guilty to one count of unlawful possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, also known as crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On August 18,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. GardelliniCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Smith, RichardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. RaglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. GarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. United States v. GoodeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. United States v. BrooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. United States v. BrooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. United States v. MuhammadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API