Legal Opinion
United States v. Ragland
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 2008No. Criminal 98-0196-01 (PLF)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant Marvin Ragland’s pro se motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (“Mot.”). The Federal Public Defender’s Office entered an appearance on Mr. Ragland’s behalf and filed a supplement to his pro se motion (“Supp.”). The government filed a response to the motion (“Opp.”), and Mr. Ragland’s counsel filed a reply (“Rep.”). The Court heard oral argument on June 27, 2008.
On August 28, 1998, Mr. Ragland pled guilty to one count of a 37-count indict ment, conspiracy to distribute and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- United States v. HameedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BurnetteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.