Legal Opinion

State v. Schenk

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 2, 1988No. C9-88-709PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This appeal is from a dispositional and durational upward departure from the presumptive sentence under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Rita Faye Schenk pleaded guilty to receiving and concealing stolen property valued in excess of $2,500.00 in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.53, subd. 1(1) (1986). In her plea, appellant admitted to a continuing course of conduct from November 1986 until her arrest in March 1987. The stolen property consisted mostly of sterling silver and jewelry taken in several burglaries in St. Paul. Appellant is a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. State v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. O'HAGANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. KobowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Perkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. KrebsbachCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API