Legal Opinion

State v. Morris

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 2000No. C5-99-864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge

In this appeal from the sentence imposed for his terroristic threats conviction, appellant Erwin Carl Morris argues that there are not substantial and compelling circumstances to support the trial court’s durational departure decision. We affirm.

FACTS

At about 6:00 a.m. on December 12, 1998, the St. Paul police received a call reporting a domestic incident that involved a knife and a gun. WThen the police arrived at the scene, Deangelo Williams told them that a man with a .22 rifle had cut him on the hand and robbed him. Williams said that the suspect, Morris, had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. BestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. STATE, CTY. OF HENNEPIN v. McClaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SALADBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API