Legal Opinion

Perkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1995No. CX-95-1399PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Donald Edward Perkins appeals the post-conviction court’s decision that (1) he failed to prove he mistakenly believed he could withdraw his guilty plea if the trial court rejected the sentencing recommendations, and (2) the trial court did not abuse its discretion by departing from the guidelines and sentencing him to the statutory maximum, and imposing a $12,000 fine. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

On September 3,1993, Perkins met A.L. in a bar. A.L. gave Perkins a ride to his hotel, and helped him carry beer up to his room. In the room, Perkins…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. SebaskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API