Legal Opinion

Baptist Missionary & Educational Convention of Texas v. Knox

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1929No. 12236PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

On February 2, 1929, in cause No. 82328 in the district court of Tar-rant county, Tex., entitled J. E. Knox et al. v. Baptist Missionary and Educational Convention of Texas, the presiding judge thereof appointed William M. McDonald receiver to take charge of the assets of the defendant corporation, conditioned upon his filing a bond as provided by statute in the sum of ¡510,000. On the same day the receiver qualified as such by giving the bond and oath required, and took charge of the assets of the defendant corporation.

The defendants took no steps to perfect an appeal from that order within…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hill v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. Lawler v. WrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Blankenship v. Little Motor Kar Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Alsworth v. DannelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Huth v. HuthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Siemers v. St. Louis Electric Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Perry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API