Legal Opinion

Perry v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1934No. 8153PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

The state of Texas has moved to dismiss this appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver upon, among others, the following grounds: (1) Because the appeal was not perfected within 20 days from the entry of the order appointing the receiver, as required by article 2250, R. S. 1925; and (2) because said article 2250 provides the exclusive method of appeal from an interlocutory order of the district court appointing a receiver, and such order may not be appealed from by writ of error under article 2255 and article 2249, R. S. 1925, as amended by Acts 1927, c. 52, § 1…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Buckler v. TurbevilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Baptist Missionary & Educational Convention of Texas v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Moore v. CobeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Texas Rubber Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huth v. HuthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Iles v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API