Blankenship v. Little Motor Kar Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
Relators seek a writ of mandamus to be directed against the judge of the Sixty-Eighth district court of Texas, requiring him to fix the amount of a super-sedeas bond on appeal from an interlocutory order of said court, entered June 10, 1920, upon an application .theretofore made by re-lators for the termination of a receivership and the discharge of Everett S. Owens as receiver in cause No. 34508, styled “A. R. Blankenship ét al. v. Little Motor Kar Co. et al.,” then pending in said court. It appears that the receiver was appointed on April 8, 1920, at the instance of the plaintiffs in the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Supreme Court · 1933
- Dick v. KazenTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Shell Petroleum Corporation v. GraysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Payne v. Little Motor Kar Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.