Legal Opinion

Goose Ridge LLC v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 10, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01058Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 GOOSE RIDGE, LLC and GOOSE CASE NO. C24-1058 MJP RIDGE VINEYARDS, LLC, 11 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR 12 RECONSIDERATION v. 13 THE OHIO CASUALTY 14 INSURANCE COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration. (Dkt. 18 No. 42.) Having reviewed the Motion, Plaintiffs’ Response (Dkt. No. 45), and all supporting 19 materials, the Court DENIES the Motion. 20 A. Legal Standard 21 Local Civil Rules specify that “[m]otions for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtis v. Security BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. Toll Bridge Authority v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Roffe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Donaldson v. WinninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. In Re Feature Realty LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API