Legal Opinion
In Re Feature Realty Litigation
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided December 13, 2006No. CV-05-333 AAMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING USF & G’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: NO COVERAGE FOR TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE
McDONALD, Senior District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company’s (“USF & G”) Motion for Summary Judgment Re: No Coverage for Tortious Interference (Ct.Rec.61). The motion was noted without oral argument and is ripe for review. The Court has considered all pleadings, including the supplemental memoranda submitted upon request of the Court. The Court concludes the motion must be denied.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Procedural History
The present insurance coverage…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Regence Group v. Tig Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Alabama Municipal Insurance Corporation v. Munich Reinsurance America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2024
- Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. Lexington Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Goose Ridge LLC v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Goose Ridge LLC v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025