Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Roffe, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
— Roffe, Inc., appeals the trial court’s order of summary judgment, arguing that under the parties’ insurance agreement, Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company was required to defend and indemnify Roffe against a former employee’s claims of employment discrimination. We affirm.
Donald Ragsdale began working for Roffe, Inc., as a sewing machine mechanic in July 1987. In April 1991, Roffe terminated Ragsdale’s employment. On May 7,1992, Ragsdale filed a complaint against Roffe, alleging that Roffe (1) failed or refused to accommodate his handicap, (2) wrongfully terminated his employment in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Hontz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Truck Ins. Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Woo v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Woo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Goodman v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.