McCarthy v. Tomlinson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
Plaintiffs sued defendants, who are attorneys, on a theory of money had and received, to recover fees that they had paid defendants. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs appeal, and we affirm.
Because this case was decided on a motion to dismiss, we accept the facts pleaded by plaintiffs as true. Sommerfeldt v. Trammell, 74 Or App 183, 187, 702 P2d 430 (1985). Plaintiffs hired defendants to prosecute a claim. According to the complaint, defendants breached their fiduciary duty to plaintiffs by (1) failing to act solely for plaintiffs’ benefit by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Schroeder v. SchaeferOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Schroeder v. SchaeferOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Adams v. Crater Well Drilling, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Sommerfeldt v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Frohnmayer v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Jantzen Beach Associates, LLC v. Jantzen Dynamic Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Jantzen Beach Associates v. JANTZEN DYNAMICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Durland v. StraubDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022