Legal Opinion

Jantzen Beach Associates, LLC v. Jantzen Dynamic Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 2004No. 0011-12284; A118541PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages of $750,000 on its claim of assumpsit against defendants.1 Plaintiffs claim arose from defendants’ violation of á restrictive covenant that prohibited interference with the visibility of plaintiffs land from North Hayden Island Drive in Portland. The trial court concluded that defendants had been unjustly enriched as a result of their violation of the covenant, and, accordingly, awarded damages to plaintiff. Defendants appeal, and plaintiff cross-appeals. We reverse on appeal and therefore do not reach the cross-appeal.

We first…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hayes v. KillingerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Raven Red Ash Coal Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  4. Slogowski v. LynessOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Fleming v. WinebergOregon Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huntsberger v. Umpqua Holdings Corp. (In re Berjac of Oregon)District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  2. Jantzen Beach Associates v. JANTZEN DYNAMICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Jantzen Beach Associates v. Jantzen Dynamic Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API