Jantzen Beach Associates, LLC v. Jantzen Dynamic Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages of $750,000 on its claim of assumpsit against defendants.1 Plaintiffs claim arose from defendants’ violation of á restrictive covenant that prohibited interference with the visibility of plaintiffs land from North Hayden Island Drive in Portland. The trial court concluded that defendants had been unjustly enriched as a result of their violation of the covenant, and, accordingly, awarded damages to plaintiff. Defendants appeal, and plaintiff cross-appeals. We reverse on appeal and therefore do not reach the cross-appeal.
We first…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Hayes v. KillingerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Raven Red Ash Coal Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Slogowski v. LynessOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Fleming v. WinebergOregon Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Huntsberger v. Umpqua Holdings Corp. (In re Berjac of Oregon)District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Jantzen Beach Associates v. JANTZEN DYNAMICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Jantzen Beach Associates v. Jantzen Dynamic Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006