Legal Opinion

Angelopoulos v. Lazarus PA Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUSMANNO, J.:

¶ 1 Lazarus PA Incorporated, Rich’s Department Stores Incorporated, and Federated Department Stores Incorporated (collectively, “Lazarus”) appeal from the Order granting the Motion for a new trial filed by Rosario Angelopoulos (“An-gelopoulos”). We affirm.

¶ 2 While shopping at a Lazarus Department Store, Angelopoulos approached an irresistible display of Godiva chocolate. According to Angelopoulos, one box of chocolates did not have a lid, and the interior cellophane wrapper covering the chocolate was slashed on both sides of the box. N.T., 9/2-5/03, at 17. At trial,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Armbruster v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. G.J.D. ex rel. G.J.D. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. GJD BY GJD v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lesoon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Karkut v. Target Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Imperial Excavating & Paving, LLC v. Rizzetto Construction Management, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Kodenkandeth, J. v. McNabb, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Zubair Taalibuddeen v. Walmart, Inc., et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API