Legal Opinion

G.J.D. ex rel. G.J.D. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1998No. 75 M.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We granted allocatur to determine whether punitive damages may be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor. We hold that such damages may be recovered, and therefore affirm.

Appellee G.J.D. and Darwin Thebes were involved in an intimate relationship for approximately five years. During that time Thebes took sexually explicit photographs1 of G.J.D. which he then kept hidden. G.J.D. did not see the photographs until several years later after she had ended her relationship with Thebes.

G. J.D. alleged that Thebes distributed photocopies of the photographs…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Hofer v. LavenderTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Jonathan Woodner Co. v. BreedenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Phillips v. Cricket LightersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Mishoe v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Robert Golden, Attorney-In-Fact for Leah Golden Donald Earwood, of the Estate of Helen Earwood v. David S. Golden Darlene KoposkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Judge Technical Services, Inc. v. ClancySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API