Lesoon v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BOWES, J.:
¶ 1 Edmond and Kathy Lesoon appeal from the judgment entered on the nonjury verdict after the trial court found that they did not sustain actual damages as a result of the deceptive sales practices of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met-Life”). MetLife has filed a cross-appeal challenging the trial court’s award of nominal damages and the court’s determination that the action was not time-barred. Upon review, we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 1
1! 2 The record reveals that Mr. Lesoon purchased two life insurance…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- DeArmitt v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Gutteridge v. J3 Energy Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Boehm, R. v. Riversource Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Egan v. USI Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.