Legal Opinion

Roberto Hernandez Miranda v. Clark County, Nevada Morgan Harris Thomas Rigsby

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 3, 2003No. 00-15734PublishedCited by 216 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Chief Judge SCHROEDER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge SILVERMAN.

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

We took this case en banc to consider whether the head of a county public defender’s office, as the administrative head of an organization formed to represent criminal defendants, may be held accountable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a policy that leads to a denial of an individual’s right to effective representation of counsel. We take principal guidance from the leading Supreme Court decisions on state and municipal…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by216 opinions

  1. Philomene Long, Surviving Spouse and Heir-At-Law of John Thomas Idlet, Deceased v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Witt v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Adron Floyd v. County of KentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Raymond Powell v. Cecil DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

211 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API