Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Nesmith
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 26, 1998No. 89239PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
707 So.2d 331 (1998)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Robert Jerome NESMITH, Respondent.
No. 89239.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 26, 1998.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John A. Boggs, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Eric M. Turner, Bar Counsel, Orlando, for Complainant.
Robert J. Nesmith, pro se, Orlando, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review the referee's report recommending that Robert Jerome Nesmith receive a public reprimand for a breach of his professional duty. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The Florida Bar seeks review of the referee's recommended discipline…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Florida Bar v. de la PuenteSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- The Florida Bar v. KravitzSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- The Florida Bar v. WeedSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Florida Bar v. GoldenSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
4Cited by4 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. SpringerSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- The Florida Bar v. CimblerSupreme Court of Florida · 2002