Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Cimbler
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 14, 2002No. SC01-116PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
840 So.2d 955 (2002)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Saul CIMBLER, Respondent.
No. SC01-116.
Supreme Court of Florida.
November 14, 2002.
Rehearing Denied March 13, 2003.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, FL; and Randolph Max Brombacher, Bar Counsel, Miami, FL, for Complainant.
Richard Baron of Baron and Cliff, Miami, FL, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical misconduct by attorney Saul Cimbler. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The Florida Bar petitions for review, challenging the…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. BernSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- The Florida Bar v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- The Florida Bar v. CenturionSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- The Florida Bar v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. Jean M. PiconSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
- The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- The Florida Bar v. MauriceSupreme Court of Florida · 2007