Florida Bar v. de la Puente
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Respondent Cesar M. de la Puente has petitioned this Court to review the findings of fact and recommended disciplinary measures in the referee’s report. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 15 of the *67Florida Constitution. We approve both the report and the recommended discipline.
This disciplinary action grew out of de la Puente’s use of client trust account funds for personal and business matters not related to the specific purpose for which the funds were held in trust. De la Puente was retained by Andrea Teresa Espino in regard to a guardianship matter for her son, Jesus…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. MacMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- The Florida Bar v. VannierSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- The Florida Bar v. BreedSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- The Florida Bar v. BernSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. SpannSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- The Florida Bar v. NowackiSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- The Florida Bar v. ViningSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- The Florida Bar v. LangeSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- The Florida Bar v. SchultzSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.