Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Springer

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 29, 2004No. SC02-1687PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

873 So.2d 317 (2004)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Arthur James SPRINGER, Respondent.

No. SC02-1687.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 29, 2004.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL; and Thomas Edward DeBerg, Assistant Staff Counsel, Tampa, FL, for Complainant.

Scott K. Tozian and Gwendolyn Hollstrom Hinkle of Smith and Tozian, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Arthur James Springer. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. For the reasons…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. The Florida Bar v. BlahaSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. The Florida Bar v. NesmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Florida Bar v. D'AmbrosioSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. Florida Bar v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. The Florida Bar v. BroomeSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Florida Bar v. FeigeSupreme Court of Florida · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API