Legal Opinion
Hackett v. ADF Restaurant Investments
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 19, 2016No. Civil No. PJM 15-1688PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Jamar Hackett, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated individuals, has brought suit against ADF Restaurant Investments, LLP, ADF Midatlantic, LLC, ADF Pizza I, LLC, and ADF Pizza II, LLG, (“Defendants”), alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. The Court conditionally certified the case as a collective action under the FLSA for potential settlement purposes. ECF No. 33. Hackett and Defendants have now reached a settlement and ask the Court to approve it and dismiss with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Grissom v. the Mills Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Luisa E. Silva v. Grant MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Dees v. Hydradry, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Acker v. Craig Testing Laboratories of Maryland Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Aleman v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of The Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Barnes v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Blasic v. Maryland State Dental Association, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Blasic v. Maryland State Dental Association, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.