Legal Opinion

JAMARR MEDLEY ANTOINE RICHARDSON and LUCIOUS MCLEOD v. UNITED STATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2014No. 11-CF-1670, 11-CF-1671 and 12-CF-7PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

Following a joint jury trial, appellants Antoine Richardson and Jamarr Medley were found guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon (ADW), aggravated assault while armed (AAWA), and assault with significant bodily injury (ASBI), and appellant Lucious McLeod was found guilty of assault with intent to kill while armed (AWIKWA), AAWA, ASBI, and obstruction of justice. Appellants raised several claims on appeal. Richardson argues that the trials were misjoined under Super. Ct. Crim. R. 8(b). Each appellant argues that his trial should have been severed from the trial of…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Omar v. Rollerson & Rolita N. Burns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. DEANDRE BROOKS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. In re D.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. McCray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API